Skip to content
Menu

Diving and snorkelling risk management

The hazards of diving and snorkelling must be managed to eliminate or minimise the risks of death, injury or illness as far as is reasonably practicable.

Effective risk management requires persons conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) to identify all hazards, assess risks and implement, maintain and review control measures.

Generally, the hazards of diving and snorkelling are either:

  • hazards that apply to the activity all or most of the time (e.g. drowning if an air supply fails or decompression illness)
  • specific to the workplace environment, human factors or the natural environment.

PCBUs undertaking high risk diving work and general diving work must undertake and document their risk management process and include specific control measures in their dive plan. PCBUs undertaking recreational diving and snorkelling should document their risk management in relation to environmental conditions, ratio of groups and level of supervision. Specific control measures for the provision of diving or snorkelling should be addressed in a dive operations manual or risk assessment..

Dive operators providing diving and snorkelling activities to members of the public have a duty to ensure that a person’s risk to health and safety are not put at risk by the provision of the activity.

The four step process for managing risks

Read more about managing risks generally.

When performing a risk assessment, the below checklists provide further information. The template and examples listed are not intended to be exhaustive, nor will every item relate to every workplace. You should conduct risk assessments for work tasks and manage the risks you find.

Identify hazards

The first step in the risk management process is to identify all hazards that might affect the health and safety of divers and snorkellers. Hazards generally arise from the following aspects of diving work and their interaction:

  • workplace environment
  • human factors
  • natural environment factors.

Hazards may be identified by looking at the workplace and how work is carried out. It is also useful to talk to workers, customers, manufacturers, suppliers and health and safety specialists and to review relevant information, records and incident reports.

General workplace environmental hazards include:

  • physical work environment (e.g. slips trips and falls, fixtures and fittings and housekeeping, noise, confined spaces, lighting and working temperature)
  • equipment, materials and substances used (e.g. plant, electrical equipment, hazardous chemicals)
  • work tasks and how they are performed (e.g. hazardous manual tasks)
  • work design and management (e.g. fatigue).

Specific diving and snorkelling workplace environmental hazards include:

  • diving equipment
  • compressors, storage and gas supply systems
  • air purity
  • vessels, including dive vessels, tenders and shipping movements
  • entry and exits
  • vessel boarding
  • associated activities such as crane operation, rigging, construction or demolition
  • entrapment or entanglement hazards
  • overhead environments
  • pressure differentials (e.g. water inlets, sluices or valves)
  • use of plant underwater.

Human risk factors apply to both workers and others, such as recreational diving and snorkelling participants.

Specific human risk factors include:

  • medical and physical fitness – this is especially relevant for the recreational industry where the medical and physical conditions of the divers and snorkellers is unknown. Dive operators must implement a system to assess the participant’s ability to conduct the activity prior to the provision of the activity.
  • competence such as:
    • relevant qualifications, training and information
    • the ability of the individual to understand and act on any advice (e.g. risks to non-English speakers).

Diving and snorkelling usually takes place in a natural environment which may create risks for different activities (e.g. conducting non-certified diving in poor visibility). PCBUs should identify natural environmental hazards before and immediately prior to the activity commencing. For recreational diving, a staff member should confirm the current and visibility by conducting an in-water assessment. Environmental conditions should be monitored during the activity for any changes that would affect the health and safety of participants.

A record (e.g. a dive safety log) should be kept of key environmental conditions and a risk assessment undertaken to decide if activities should be modified or cancelled. This should be documented along with any modifications to the operations.

Environmental factors include:

  • non-respirable nature of water
  • water temperature
  • current and tide
  • visibility
  • depths
  • time of day
  • underwater terrain
  • surface conditions- waves and surge
  • weather
  • isolation
  • chemical or biological hazards
  • dangerous marine animals such as jellyfish, sharks and crocodiles.

Assess the risk

A risk assessment involves considering what could happen if someone is exposed to a hazard and the likelihood of it happening. A risk assessment can help determine:

  • how severe a risk is
  • whether existing control measures are effective
  • what action should be taken to control the risk
  • how urgently the action needs to be taken.

Many hazards and their associated risks are well known and have well established and accepted control measures. In these situations, the second step to formally assess the risk is unnecessary. If identifying a hazard where the risk and how to control the risk are already known, the controls can simply be implemented.

The severity of health and safety outcomes for many hazards associated with diving work mean that most identified hazards will require high level control measures, multiple control measures, redundancy in the event of system failures and emergency back-up.

Control the risks

When implementing control measures consider the following:

Once the PCBU has assessed the risks of the diving, the next step is to manage the risks by eliminating them, or if that is not practicable, minimising them so far as is reasonably practicable.

In selecting any control measures, standard operational practices such as Australian Standards or training agency standards may be used if the control measures are compatible with the diving legislation.

There are a number of ways to minimise and control risks associated with diving. Some control measures are more effective than others. Control measures can be ranked from the highest level of protection and reliability to the lowest. This is known as the hierarchy of control.

The most effective control measure involves eliminating the hazard and associated risk. The best way to do this is by, firstly, not introducing the hazard into the workplace.

Example 1 – Environmental conditions on the day of travel are beyond the ability of the passengers and crew to conduct the activities safely under normal operating conditions. The dive operator takes the decision to reduce the ratios of diving groups (i.e. taking non-certified divers at a ratio of 2:1 instead of 4:1). Or if the conditions are sufficiently bad then the operator may decide to cancel the activities until such time as the conditions improve.

Example 2 – Risks could be eliminated from diving work by undertaking the work at the surface, such as by waiting for low tide to undertake work in the inter-tidal zone.

Substituting an activity, procedure, plant, process or substance for one that lessens the risk to health and safety will contribute to minimising the risks to health and safety associated with the hazard.

Example 1 – A dive operator arrives at their main snorkelling site, but the wind is blowing from a different direction to normal causing poor surface conditions. The operator substitutes by using a different site that is sheltered from the prevalent winds.

Example 2 – Requiring workers to undertake multiple ascents to bring catch to the surface while diving for seafood exposes the divers to increased risk of developing decompression illness. This risk could be controlled by substituting this activity with plant and procedure allowing the catch to be sent to the surface unattended by the diver.

Isolating persons from a hazard by removing or separating the person from the source of the hazard will contribute to minimising the risks associated with the hazard. Isolation is only effective if the control measure ensures that a person is unable to expose themselves to the risks associated with the hazard.

Example 1 – A busy pontoon operation has multiple vessels operating in close proximity to snorkellers and divers. The operator isolates the snorkelling/diving area from surface vessels by using signals and barriers such as ropes and floats, to minimise the risk.

Example 2 – Divers in some environments may be at risk of attack by marine predators such as crocodiles. Isolating the diving work area by using cages or physical barriers will contribute to minimising this risk.

An engineering control measure is where the physical characteristics of the plant, structure or work area are changed to remove or contribute to minimising the risks to health and safety associated with the hazard.

Example 1 – A rescue tender is expected to operate in the near vicinity of persons in the water, exposing them to the risk of being injured by the vessels propeller. Guarding the vessels propeller will contribute to minimising the risk.

Example 2 – A diver accessing a confined space, such as a storage tank, is at risk if they are unable to be retrieved from the tank should they need to be rescued. Erecting a frame to which lifting equipment suitable for extracting the diver from the tank will contribute to minimising the risk.

An administrative control measure is where procedures, signs and training are used to minimise the risk to health and safety. Administrative controls rely on a person's behaviour and therefore require initial competence, thorough training and a high level of supervision to ensure that the procedure is being adhered to.

Example 1 – A dive operator wants passengers to follow some safety guidelines in the water. The operator provides a briefing to customers detailing what these guidelines are.

Example 2 – A PCBU wishes to ensure breathing apparatus and other items of the diver's equipment are correctly fitted and functioning. In combination with higher order control measures a pre-dive equipment checklist is developed and implemented. Implementation includes providing information and training to the divers about the use of the checklist, and supervision to ensure that the checklist is being correctly and consistently used.

An administrative control must only be considered where higher order control measures are not reasonably practicable or where the use of an administrative control will further minimise the risks to health and safety in combination with higher order controls.

Almost every aspect of dive planning falls into this administrative category. Administrative controls include:

  • training, supervision, experience and selection of workers, including staffing levels
  • provision of an appropriate diving operations manual
  • organisation and planning before, during and after the dive.

Many PCBUs develop operational documents to clearly identify the control measures they have adopted. Workers must be instructed so that they clearly understand their duties and responsibilities with regard to the implementation of any control measures.

AS/NZS 2299.1: 2015 Occupational diving operations – Standard operational practice Appendix [E] provides an example of the structure of a diving operations manual for general diving work.

PPE is the lowest order control measure in the hierarchy of control. PPE as a control measure relies on a person's behaviour and therefore requires thorough training and a high level of supervision to ensure compliance and effectiveness. PPE includes any clothing or equipment designed to be worn by a person and to contribute to minimising risks to the person's health and safety.

Example 1 – Divers and snorkellers may be exposed to risks from marine stings. Where higher order controls are not reasonably practicable, or to further minimise the risks, participants should be provided with a stinger suit to minimise the risk of a marine sting.

Example 2 – The operation of machinery associated with diving work, such as air compressors exposes workers to the risk of injury from noise. In conjunction with higher order controls, workers should wear hearing protection.

In many cases a combination of control measures will be required to minimise the risks to health and safety.

Example – The risk to divers working in the same area as moving vessels could be controlled by implementing a number of measures such as:

  • replacing a vessel which has a restricted field of vision by one that has a clear field of vision (substitution)
  • segregating the divers and vessels through signs, barriers, distance and time (isolation)
  • ensuring there is adequate voice communication between all vessel masters, the dive supervisor and any lookouts (engineering)
  • installing guards on relevant exposed propellers (engineering)
  • develop and implement a vessel traffic management plan for the activities being undertaken (administrative)
  • ensuring all relevant workers are competent, are provided with adequate information and training and are supervised to implement the control measures (administrative),
  • requiring all divers to wear high visibility reflective clothing or headgear (PPE).

Note: The PCBU must ensure that, in selecting a control measure, new hazards are not being created. If new hazards are created, these must be identified, risk assessed and either eliminated or controlled.

Reviewing risk controls

Diving workplaces regularly change, no two workplaces are the same. Environmental factors can change quickly while tasks and sites can change on a daily basis.

Ensuring work health and safety within this dynamic workplace requires a PCBU to ensure that a competent person (e.g. the dive supervisor) continually monitors, consults, and reviews work practices, hazards, risks and control measures.

Once the control measures have been implemented, they must be reviewed regularly to make sure that they remain effective. For example, a dive supervisor must review risk control measures if there is a significant change to:

  • the manner in which diving work is to be carried out
  • the environmental conditions in which the work is to be carried out or if the following occur:
    • a notifiable incident occurs in relation to diving work
    • a risk control measure does not control the risks associated with diving work
    • a health and safety representative at the workplace requests a review
    • consultation indicates that a review is necessary.

The PCBU must revise a control measure if the review identifies that the control measure is not minimising the risks to health and safety.

If diving work is occurring and there is a significant change that is outside the scope of the initial assessment in the dive environment or way the work is being undertaken; and the change increases the risks to health and safety, then the PCBU should ensure that:

  • the work stops immediately
  • the work is not resumed until the control measures are reviewed and as necessary revised and any new or different control measures are implemented.

Reviewing the risk controls involves considering whether applying a higher order risk control is now reasonably practicable.

The PCBU must also ensure information about any changes to control measures is provided to all relevant persons. This may include training about the new control measures (e.g. by a toolbox talk) and the revision of administrative controls such as diving operations manuals and dive plans.