Skip to content

Lifter borer boom failure

Issued: 26 April 2016
Last updated: 26 April 2016


The purpose of this safety alert is to highlight the importance of regular maintenance and inspection of lifter borers and the need to follow the manufacturer's operating instructions.

Photograph 1: General view of failed boom
Photograph 1: General view of failed boom.


In early 2016 there was an incident involving a lifter borer where the boom broke off close to its pivot point. The lifter borer involved in the incident was nearly 20 years old.

Lifter borers are used extensively in the power supply industry to install and remove power poles. This plant is a type of mobile crane that is specifically designed for installing and removing poles and can be exposed to severe loading.

The type of loading applied to the plant is more complex than that applied to a crane due the load applied by the auger - this includes an additional bending moment applied to the boom when the boom is pushing the auger down into the ground as the auger digs a hole. The loading applied to the auger can also include shock loading when the auger is being used - particularly when the auger is cutting through rock. Lifter borers are sometimes used to pull poles out of the ground [1] and this loading has the potential to exceed crane load ratings. While it is acknowledged that most lifter borer manufacturers do not approve pulling poles out of the ground with the hoist rope, this activity is known to take place.

In the lead-up to the incident an attempt was being made to pull the pole out of the ground when the boom failed. The failed boom did not drop to the ground as the top end of the boom was supported by the pole grips holding onto the partially embedded power pole in the ground.

Lifter borers locate the operator's seat above the slew ring and next to the boom. If the boom had been free to drop, the operator could have been seriously injured or killed.

Photograph 2: Failed boom removed from vehicle (butt section circled)
Photograph 2: Failed boom removed from vehicle (butt section circled).

Contributing factors

A preliminary investigation indicates the following factors contributed to the incident:

  • insufficient maintenance and inspection
  • a large amount of grease and grime around the failure area that may have hidden cracks.

Photograph 3: Boom base torn away from pivot point (failure area indicated by red arrow)
Photograph 3: Boom base torn away from pivot point (failure area indicated by red arrow).

Photograph 4: Crack initiation area in weld underneath wear plate (arrows indicate failed welds)
Photograph 4: Crack initiation area in weld underneath wear plate (arrows indicate failed welds).

Action required


Always operate lifter borers according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Where a rated capacity limit system is provided and is fitted with a system override switch/key, the system override is not to be operated while lifting a load.

Pole extraction

Lifter borers should not be used to pull poles out of the ground unless the:

  • manufacturer states that this can take place
  • unit is fitted with a rated capacity limiter to help prevent overload of the unit.

Where the manufacturer states that the unit can be used for this activity, it is to be operated in strict compliance with the manufacturer's instructions.

During pole removal there is a risk of inadvertent crane overload when the pole being extracted breaks free from the ground and the pole 'bounces' resulting in high dynamic loads being applied to the crane.

Maintenance and inspection

It is critical that all lifter borers are adequately maintained and inspected. The program of inspection and maintenance should be in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Pre-operational inspection, including visual inspection and functional testing, should be completed by the operator before the commencement of each work shift.

Routine inspection and maintenance activities should be based on time intervals and/or hours of use. The size and mass of the loads lifted will affect the degree of maintenance required. The maintenance program should take into account additional load cycles as a result of road travel. The adverse effects of road travel will be increased if the units are driven over rough roads often found in rural locations.

Routine maintenance should include a visual inspection of critical welds on the boom and outriggers, particularly those around the boom butt section, after grease and dirt have been cleaned off. Photograph 5 shows some of the accessible welds on the butt section of the boom on a similar unit to the one involved in the recent incident. Inaccessible welds can be inspected during the major inspection and if there are other signs of cracking or damage. In these cases, the boom may need to be removed prior to the next major inspection.

As a unit ages, more frequent inspection and maintenance is required, especially as it approaches the end of its design life. When the condition of the unit deteriorates to the extent that signs of cracking and wear becomes prominent, then it is a good indication that the unit has reached the end of its usable life and should be decommissioned, cut up and scrapped.

Major inspection

A number of lifter borer manufacturers specify that a major strip down inspection be carried out at intervals not exceeding 10 years. The major inspection should include dismantling of the boom, pins, slew ring and outriggers along with comprehensive inspection of all high stress areas. This is consistent with the information provided in the Mobile Crane Code of Practice 2006 (PDF, 1.34 MB) for major inspections on mobile cranes.

The 10 year major inspection is not a guarantee that the lifter borer will have an additional 10 year life. Completion of the 10 year major inspection along with ongoing maintenance and inspection, including annual safety inspections, is a good practice to keep the plant in a safe condition.

During the annual inspection of the unit some of the critical parts will not be sighted. Safety issues that develop should become apparent during this ongoing inspection and maintenance.

Photograph 5: View of boom butt section showing some of the accessible welds
Photograph 5: View of boom butt section showing some of the accessible welds.

Inspection personnel

The annual crane inspection must be carried out by a competent person who can demonstrate they have adequate training, knowledge and experience to carry out the task.

A number of crane owners have the annual safety inspection carried out by an independent competent person who is not involved in the maintenance of the plant. While legislation in Queensland does not mandate that the competent person is independent, this is considered to be best practice. Engaging an independent competent person who is not involved in maintenance of the crane is consistent with benchmarks specified in the AS 2550 Cranes – Safe use series of Australian Standards.

Additionally, AS 2550 specifies that the annual (periodic inspection) is to include crane duty recording and assessment of design working period (DWP). The purpose of the DWP assessment is to estimate the accumulated duty of the crane and assess its remaining life. DWP should be carried out in conjunction with the periodic third-party inspections.

For registrable mobile cranes in Queensland, the major inspection is overseen and signed off by a Queensland registered professional engineer (RPEQ). For other mobile cranes it is also advisable that an inspection is overseen by a registered professional engineer.


Comprehensive maintenance and inspection documentation should be kept for the life of the unit.

This inspection documentation should include:

  • checklists
  • records of parts replaced
  • invoices for work done
  • inspection certificates.

When units are sold all documentation should be supplied to the new owner.

Further information

Information on the safe use and maintenance of mobile cranes is provided in the: