Details of successful prosecution against E224158 - Company
The defendant company held duties under s.19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 being a person conducting a business or undertaking, operating a commercial dairy. At the time of sentence it had been in business for more than 16 years, and employed more than 40 workers.
One of the defendant’s workers was a 60 year old maintenance person (an experienced fitter and turner/boiler maker) whose work included use of plant owned by the defendant company. On 4 February 2016 the worker was removing a fan from an electric motor being assisted by other workers. The worker tried a number of methods to remove the fan however was unsuccessful. The worker then decided to use an angle grinder and asked another worker to obtain it from inside a cupboard.
The angle grinder was a Bosch 230 mm (9”) angle grinder with attachments including an oversized abrasive cutting disc/cut off wheel. It did not have a guard attached to it. The disc attached to the grinder was incompatible in that it was oversized. At some stage, the grinder had been modified to fit the larger disc. It was not known who modified or authorised the modifications to the grinder. The grinder was owned by the defendant company.
In the process of cutting bolts from the fan, the cut off wheel affixed to the plant shattered into several shards fatally striking his chest area.
WHSQ commenced an investigation. It was found that the hazard was not adequately assessed prior to allowing workers to perform work in that there was a failure to adhere to the Operator’s Manual. A regime for inspection of plant did not exist at the workplace.
Prosecution submitted the system of work was inadequate and that the defendant did not have an inspection regime in place relating to plant. The risk was able to be eliminated or minimised.
The defendant pleaded guilty in the Maroochydore Magistrates Court on 9 June 2017 to breaching s.32 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011, having failed to meet its work health and safety duties and was sentenced.
Magistrate Annette Hennessy fined the defendant $135,000 and ordered professional and court costs totaling $1579.40. No conviction was recorded.
Her Honour found that there was no regime in place for inspection of plant, particularly power tools. The incident occurred in a workshop where the angle grinder was readily available. The risk was obvious, foreseeable and the steps to eliminate it were available. Her Honour found that the defendant could have easily had regard to the Managing Risks of Plant Code of Practice 2013, but took into account that post incident significant measures were put in place and found this relevant on specific deterrence.
In deciding penalty, Magistrate Hennessey took into account the defendant had not been prosecuted previously for any work health and safety breach, co-operated with the investigation and entered an early plea of guilty.
Considerations for prevention
(commentary under this heading is not part of the court's decision)
When working in the Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing industry where there is exposure to risks from incomplete or defective scaffolding, duty holders should consider the following:
- Agriculture, forestry and fishing
- E224158 - Company
- Date of offence:
- Maroochydore Magistrates Court
- Annette Hennessey
- s.32 of the duty under s.19 Work Health and Safety Act 2011
- Decision date:
- Fined $135,000
- Maximum Penalty:
- Conviction recorded:
- CIS event number:
- Last updated
- 02 July 2018
We'd love your feedback
Codes of Practice are now an enforceable standard to manage hazards and risks
A Work Health and Safety inspector may refer to an approved code of practice when issuing an improvement or prohibition notice.
WorkCover Queensland accident insurance policy renewal
Pay your premium in full or set up a payment plan quickly and easily online before the 30 September deadline.